Welcome. Here’s a post that will hopefully be a bit of an ‘Aha moment’ for you. Maybe not. This is the funny thing about the Signal controversy. Now when I say funny, I mean odd. Not funny ha-ha, but funny, like ‘that’s weird’. So, we’re all supposed to be up in arms over war plans being shared over a group text on a ‘secure’ app called Signal. That’s the big story that we’re all supposed to be focused on.
Okay. I’ll play for a little bit. Let’s say all the big wigs in DC were discussing the most sensitive stuff in the history of warfare. (They weren’t) Let’s say it was more top secret that storming the beaches at Normandy in WW2! And somehow these big wigs included a reporter from the Post. Would that reporter tell the world? Seems like a dick move. He’d be responsible for giving the enemy our super-secret plans! So, I’m not buying the whole ‘they invited me into their war plans chat and I had to tell you’ Angle. Read for yourself.
So, if there isn’t any real classified information on the signal chat? And no lives were in danger, why run with the Signal story? It’s almost like someone wanted to change the conversation. Almost. Surely no one in the Intelligence Community would do that to the good ol’ US of A!
It’s probably just a crazy coincidence. People aren’t perfect. America needs answers about the Signal Fiasco… right after we get answers about this one:
And lastly, there’s this. So, everyone can un-wad their panties.
